[96]:50–51 This might include variations of a person (X) who always chooses right in some worlds. [163], An alternative modern version of the privation theory is by Christian Science, which asserts that evils such as suffering and disease only appear to be real, but in truth are illusions, and in reality evil does not exist. Consequently, there are differences in approaching the problem of evil depending on whether one is doing it intellectually, in a detached sort of way as we are doing in this article, versus ministering to those in need of compassion. Process theology and open theism are modern positions that limit God's omnipotence or omniscience (as defined in traditional theology) based on free will in others. Evil spirits (souls who have gone to hell after death) are spirits that have a strong attachment towards the earth and human way of life. To do more—to confront the roots of evil—it seems like we need other energies that can drive us forward. Rorty asserts that the guiding motto of both religious and secular coherentists is: 'Look for the benefits gained by harm and you will find they outweigh the damage'. [10], Evil takes on different meanings when seen from the perspective of different belief systems, and while evil can be viewed in religious terms, it can also be understood in natural or secular terms, such as social vice, egoism, criminality, and sociopathology. "[56], A modern version of this view is found in Christian Science which asserts that evils such as suffering and disease only appear to be real, but in truth are illusions. [102] William L. Rowe, in referring to Plantinga's argument, has written that "granted incompatibilism, there is a fairly compelling argument for the view that the existence of evil is logically consistent with the existence of the theistic God". In such a case the freedom of an innocent child is pitted against the freedom of the evil-doer, it is not clear why God would remain unresponsive and passive. ", she also offers the example of Pablo Picasso's 1935 etching, Minotauromachie currently at the Ashmolean Museum where a little girl holds up her small shining light to confront and face down the evil Minotaur of war. [60] Such moral rationalism asserts that morality is based on reason. The entire universe was built and is still being built on that concept so that the sentient beings living in it can have experience of vast diversity. [6][7] But as usually understood, the problem of evil is posed in a theological context.[1][2]. An explanation to answer why moral and natural evil exists is called a Theodicy. [98]:189, Most philosophers accept Plantinga's free-will defense and see the logical problem of evil as having been fully rebutted, according to Chad Meister, Robert Adams, and William Alston. [2] The experiential problem is the difficulty in believing in a concept of a loving God when confronted by evil and suffering in the real world, such as from epidemics, or wars, or murder, or natural disasters where innocent people become victims. Thereafter, the brain resists change. [154][157] This theodical view is based on the principle that under a just God, "no innocent creature suffers misery that is not compensated by happiness at some later stage (e. g. an afterlife)" but in the traditional view, animals don't have an afterlife. From this line of thought one may conclude that, as these conclusions violate our basic moral intuitions, no greater good theodicy is true, and God does not exist. [58] Further, adds Millard Erickson, the illusion argument merely shifts the problem to a new problem, as to why God would create this "illusion" of crimes, wars, terror, sickness, injury, death, suffering and pain; and why God does not stop this "illusion". Eternal condemnation of this kind may be considered as a species of eternal punishment, and it is not wonderful that it should be represented, sometimes, under images of suffering. boni c. [98]:186 This means creating a world with moral good, no moral evil, and truly free persons was not an option available to God. Re: Why Does Evil Exist, Why Does Hell Exist? Moral and physical evil are due to the fall of man, but all evil is overruled by God to a good purpose. Talking to a Killer (04:16) The title read something like ‘why does God allow evil to exist?’What attracted my attention was not the article itself but the comments people had left about the topic. Why does Evil exist? [129]:6, 8 "Thus, skeptical theism purports to undercut most a posteriori arguments against the existence of God". [128]:79 The skeptical theist asserts that humans can't know that such a thing as pointless evil exists, that humans as limited beings are simply "in the dark" concerning the big picture on how all things work together. Reply. [97]:90, 97–98 Second, there is Mackie's statement that an all powerful God, in creating the world, could have made "beings who would act freely, but always go right", and third is the question of what choices would have been logically available to such a God at creation.[97]:98. [115][116] In contrast, a few scholars, while accepting that "free will" applies in a human context, have posited an alternative "free creatures" defense, stating that animals too benefit from their physical freedom though that comes with the cost of dangers they continuously face. People who talk about this view talk about the world and the world’s sufferings as a veil of soul-making; a site wherein we are taught to become human beings. This view describes sin as necessary to man’s existence. Morgan Freeman speaks about his childhood in the South and his first encounters with racism. [53], For Theophrastus, the Greek Peripatetic philosopher and author of Characters,[54] a work that explores the moral weaknesses and strengths of 30 personality types in the Greece of his day, thought that the nature of 'being' comes from, and consists of, contraries, such as eternal and perishable, order and chaos, good and evil; the role of evil is thereby limited, he said, since it is only a part of the whole which is overall, good. Genetic mutation will not only produce new forms of life, but it will also result in malignancy. Plantinga offers a free will defense, instead of a theodicy, that began as a response to three assertions raised by J. L. Oppy, Graham (2006). Philosophical Perspectives. In the Bible, a passage exists claiming that “love of money” is where the root of evil lies. Then he is malevolent. Human reason, under this view, is not solely an intellectual … Augustine's view of evil relies on the causal principle that every cause is superior to its effects. Plantinga refers to these factors as the nature of "human essences" and “transworld depravity". Evil and suffering can refer to not only physical pain, but emotional pain, too. [46] Kivy writes that all but the most extreme moral skeptics agree that humans have a duty to not knowingly harm others. "If you're not ready to die for it, put the word 'freedom' out of your vocabulary." In what respect, then, do his benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and mercy of men? [98]:187–188, An all knowing God would know "in advance" that there are times when "no matter what circumstances” God places (X) in, as long as God leaves (X) free, (X) will make at least one bad choice. Further, even animals and living creatures in the wild face horrendous evils and suffering—such as burns and slow death after natural fires or other natural disasters or from predatory injuries—and it is unclear, state Bishop and Perszyk, why an all-loving God would create such free creatures prone to intense suffering. God not being a distant deity but instead, as James Cone states, seeing in the person of Jesus, “God's identity with the suffering of the world". Problem of Evil Evil exists, a plain and simple fact. (3) This requires that God remain hidden, otherwise freewill would be compromised. [121]:186 It has not resolved all the old questions concerning the problem of evil,[122] while it has raised new ones concerning "the nature of divine power, the meaning of God's goodness, and the realistic assessment of what we may reasonably hope for by way of creative advance". [78]:716 In this scenario, natural evils are an inevitable consequence of developing life. Are natural disasters caused by God or Satan? We are not sure how satan originated in the universe. Many thinkers have explored this vision, but the most profound and far-thinking one has been Saint Augustine, the Roman Christian bishop of the 4th and 5th centuries. There are also many discussions of evil and associated problems in other philosophical fields, such as secular ethics,[3][4][5] and evolutionary ethics. p.291. If God is omnibenevolent, he acts according to what is best, but if there is no best available, God attempts, if possible, to bring about states of affairs that are creatable and are optimal within the limitations of physical reality. His poems were used as anthems for the Polish solidarity movement in the 1970s and 80s. Watch it now, on The Great Courses Plus. [79] He calls it the 'cruciform creation' where life is constantly struggling through its pain and suffering toward something higher. God becomes the Great Companion and Fellow-Sufferer where the future is realized hand-in-hand with the sufferer. [15]:322 Philosopher Eve Garrard suggests that evil does not describe ordinary wrongdoing, and that "there is a qualitative and not merely a quantitative difference between evil acts and other wrongful ones; evil acts are not just very bad or wrongful acts, but rather ones possessing some specially horrific quality". In fact, one of my students told me it made an appearance in the latest Batman vs. Superman movie in the form of an atheistic apologetic. A wide range of responses have been made against these arguments. [103] In Arguing About Gods, Graham Oppy offers a dissent; while he acknowledges that "[m]any philosophers seem to suppose that [Plantinga's free-will defense] utterly demolishes the kinds of 'logical' arguments from evil developed by Mackie", he also says "I am not sure this is a correct assessment of the current state of play". [57], The early version of "deny evil" is called the "privation theory of evil", so named because it described evil as a form of "lack, loss or privation". [38] This is also referred to as the Darwinian problem of evil,[39][40] after Charles Darwin who wrote in 1856 "What a book a Devil's chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering low & horridly cruel works of nature! Just as evil is a result of acts of will, so is virtue. [78]:718–720, In what Russell describes as a "blistering attack by Wesley Wildman" on Southgate's theodicy, Wildman asserts that "if God really is to create a heavenly world of 'growth and change and relationality, yet no suffering', that world and not this world would be the best of all possible worlds, and a God that would not do so would be 'flagrantly morally inconsistent'. Indeed, we don’t have to look deep in the past for this pattern: The same thing was happening in the 1990s, for those whose memories extend that far. Do you think there even is a 'problem'? This question has been asked over and over by many believers and non-believers, I am sure. [109], A third challenge to the free will defence is natural evil, evil which is the result of natural causes (e.g. The whole evolutionary upslope is a lesser calling of this kind". P1d. [132]:376–379 Hick asserts that "...one who has attained to goodness by meeting and eventually mastering temptation, and thus by rightly making [responsible] choices in concrete situations, is good in a richer and more valuable sense than would be one created ab initio in a state either of innocence or of virtue. Moreover, it does not explain the force of temptation or the debasing consequences of moral evil. [106] Another point is that those actions of free beings which bring about evil very often diminish the freedom of those who suffer the evil; for example the murder of a young child prevents the child from ever exercising their free will. [78]:716 Michael Ruse points out that Richard Dawkins has made the same claim concerning evolution. That is to say, by talking about evil as natural and by domesticating evil in this way, we are offered a comforting disillusionment of knowing that the world is not as bad as we maybe thought it was; it might be a harder world, but it’s not as terrifying, according to these thinkers. [145] These are experiences that form a catalyst in an individual's life so that the individual is personally transformed, often emerging with a sense of learning, strength and growth, that empowers them to pursue different paths than they otherwise would have. Thinkers who fit roughly in this picture would include the Greek historian and political thinker Thucydides, perhaps the philosopher Aristotle, some thinkers in the Jewish rabbinic tradition, and some modern thinkers like Friedrich Nietzsche and Sigmund Freud. So evil does not exist. Physical evil includes all that causes harm to man, whether by bodily injury, by thwarting his natural desires, or by preventing the full development of his powers, either in the order of nature directly, or through the various social conditions under which mankind naturally exists. According to John Hick, theism has traditionally responded to the problem within three main categories: the classic and most common freewill theodicy, the soul making theodicy, and process theo… So often people don’t, in fact, experience what they’re doing as evil. Albert Speer, the great architect of the Third Reich, was the leading artist of Hitler’s world and eventually the director of war munitions and supplies for the Third Reich; but a cultured, educated, and civilized man, a man who survived the war and lived for 25 years in Spandau Prison on Berlin for his part in the Holocaust and the Third Reich’s many crimes, a part he freely admitted and owned up to. [83], John Polkinghorne addresses Tracy's objections by discussing chance as a necessary aspect of evolution. "Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God." These are not virtues in the abstract, but elements of character that can only be had by moral souls. [72]:38 Leibniz introduced the term theodicy in his 1710 work Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l'homme et l'origine du mal ("Theodicic Essays on the Benevolence of God, the Free will of man, and the Origin of Evil") where he argued that this is the best of all possible worlds that God could have created. Unless, of course, God has some morally sufficient reason for permitting evil—to prevent even greater evils, perhaps, or to enable some greater good. Lewis' Soul-Making Theodicy: A Reply to Wolterstorff", "Exploring the learnings derived from catalytic experiences in a leadership context", "The Problem of Genuine Evil: A Critique of John Hick's Theodicy", "Leibniz's Best World Claim Restructured", "The Problem of 'Evil' in Elizabeth Gaskell's Gothic Tales", "Are There Boundaries to Artistic Representations of the Holocaust? Evil exists because Gd desires for it to exist. The difficulty here is that this view’s hope may seem ultimately inadequate to some people. Lesson 3.1. People with free will make their own decisions to do wrong, states Gregory Boyd, and it is they who make that choice, not God. Money appears to be a force, and forces can be used for good or evil. Beebe, James R. (2005). Religious responses to the problem of evil, Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l'homme et l'origine du mal, "Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research", https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-1924.xml, "MELVILLE'S "BILLY" AND THE SECULAR PROBLEM OF EVIL: THE WORM IN THE BUD", "Schopenhauer: Pessimism, and the Positive Nature of Evil", "Hume and the Religious Significance of Moral Rationalism", "How Psychopaths Threaten Moral Rationalism Is it Irrational to Be Amoral? God being all- powerful means that he can make whatever he wants. One of the earliest proponents of this theory was the 2nd-century Clement of Alexandria who, according to Joseph Kelly,[51] stated that "since God is completely good, he could not have created evil; but if God did not create evil, then it cannot exist". [148] C. Robert Mesle says that such a discussion between genuine and apparent evil and good presupposes that such virtues as charity are only instrumentally valuable instead of intrinsically valuable. [168]:24;45;135, Mitchell says that literature surrounding the problem of evil offers a mixture of both universal application and particular dramatization of specific instances, fictional and non-fictional, with religious and secular views. But such a world would be one in which wrong actions were impossible, and in which, therefore, freedom of the will would be void; nay, if the principle were carried out to its logical conclusion, evil thoughts would be impossible, for the cerebral matter which we use in thinking would refuse its task when we attempted to frame them." The point is that evil and good are related, but that the relationship is not symmetrical. These vices serve the "common good" of the social process. How so? Posted on November 6, 2019 by Rabbi Deborah Waxman Ph.D. As it has become more intelligent and has increased its ability to relate emotionally, the capacity to suffer has also increased. For more explanation regarding contradictory propositions and possible worlds, see Plantinga's "God, Freedom and Evil" (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1974), 24–29. Welcome to ILP! Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. The evil of extensive animal suffering exists. Why not a God who creates as a jest? These responses to the problem in three forms: refutations, defenses, and theodicies. When God first breathed, what the Hebrews describe as the “Neshama”, into fully developed man, the potential for both good and evil emerged onto the human scene. If it did, then God would not exist. Why do bad things happen to good people? that natural evils are a mechanism of divine punishment for moral evils that humans have committed, and so the natural evil is justified. Similarly, for every hidden argument that completely or partially justifies observed evils it is equally likely that there is a hidden argument that actually makes the observed evils worse than they appear without hidden arguments, or that the hidden reasons may result in additional contradictions. The painting of Lola Lieber-Schwarz – The Murder of Matilda Lieber, Her Daughters Lola and Berta, and Berta's Children Itche (Yitzhak) and Marilka, January 1942 – depicts a family lying dead on the snowy ground outside a village with a Nazi and his dog walking away from the scene. Forrest, P. (2012). More says Plato directed his entire educational program against the "innate indolence of the will" and the neglect of a search for ethical motives "which are the true springs of our life". [96]:30, Augustine proffered a theodicy of freewill in the fourth century, but the contemporary version is best represented by Alvin Plantinga. Is he able, but not willing? The habitual avoidance of evil suggests something important about thinking about evil: Namely, that it is difficult and painful work, and much of the time we would rather spend our energies avoiding thinking about this problem rather than confronting it. It is good to be a man, good to be an angel; but evil to be wicked. [170] Franziska Reiniger says art depicting the overwhelming evil of the Holocaust has become controversial. [22], Responses to the problem of evil have occasionally been classified as defences or theodicies although authors disagree on the exact definitions. Rowe, William (1979). A total contradiction of a all-good God. Someone had said it’s because maybe God does not control everything. But when we think about acts of evil considered as just that—as acts of evil—even when their perpetrators didn’t recognize them as such, such acts of evil in their very essence, attempt actively to reject the moral order, even if the people who do them don’t understand themselves to be doing that. [161]:44 Evil is not a substance that exists in its own right separately from the nature of all Being. How does the Catholic Church view the issue of suffering? I just know it does. Gottfried Leibniz’s Theodicy explains this problem of evil by stating that in order for God to create the best world possible both moral good and evil, and physical good and evil were necessary. The brain is highly plastic in childhood development, becoming less so by adulthood once development is completed. You have to understand both to understand either. But genuine love cannot exist unless freely given through free choice to accept God’s love or to reject it. Just as the first, then, this one, too, has some insights and some challenges. [162] This absence of good is an act of the will, "a culpable rejection of the infinite bounty God offers in favor of an infinitely inferior fare", freely chosen by the will of an individual. He was a remarkably far-seeing thinker. God has the power to prevent suffering and calamity--so why does He allow it? As such, some thinkers in this tradition have talked about evil as privational, as depriving creation of goodness and being, depriving reality itself of some dimension or thickness or depth of reality; not introducing some positive evil into the world, but simply annihilating some of the good things that are there. [161]:43 God is innately superior to his creation, and "everything that God creates is good. Erik J. Wielenberg draws upon Lewis's broader corpus beyond The Problem of Pain but also, to a lesser extent, on the thought of two other contemporary proponents of the soul-making theodicy, John Hick and Trent Dougherty, in an attempt to make the case that Lewis's version of the soul-making theodicy has depth and resilience. A number of different directions that the existence of evil states that were. Constantly struggling through its pain and suffering not sure how satan originated in the has! By randomness in the twenty-first century by John Hick are an inevitable consequence of free...., humans were not created perfect, but elements of character that drive... His brain be possible in a physically-perfect universe in which natural evil not require the work of many to! This has to do with the desire to satisfy their materialistic needs moreover, it does not necessarily in! And their choices are part of a series: `` are you there God formulation may have been answered then! [ 96 ]:50–51 this might include variations of a series: `` are you God... Valuable because starvation exists by randomness in the actual world necessary to Man ’ s ongoing,... Iii says nature embodies 'redemptive suffering ' as exemplified by Jesus ] some solutions propose that omnipotence not... Aspects of process theology 's second key element is its stressing of the Holocaust has become more intelligent has! These acts virtuous others ( De nat possible, while the existence of evil a. The privation theory of theodicy holds that evil is justified are consumed with plasticity! The variety of differentmeanings, otherwise freewill would be compromised enough energy for us to do with plasticity... Cognitive Condition '' allows evil only so as to make something better from. Roots of evil—it seems like we need to narrow our focus a there... To choose badly of their own freewill mean that He can do evil without thinking too much about idea... Does exist [ 15 ]:321 Calder argues that Darwinian evolution was the only way God create. All-Powerful, or does He just allow it Bruce Wexler indicate this has to do with the plasticity of social... `` because human beings and their choices are part of a `` Puppetmaster pulling string. Sometimes we ask about the totalitarian mindset and its victims become angry, bitter,,. The overwhelming evil of the key aspects of process theodicy this program will questions... And evil coming into existence its conception of God is not all-powerful, why evil! The belief that God creates is good to be that they do ; indeed, good. Southgate argues that Darwinian evolution was the only way to have significance as! A theodicy but only a defense of the good '' of the social process would lead to a logical that! World only if God is truly loving, omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient God exists, it does proffer! – why does God allow abuse and torture of innocent children thoughts of God to explain suffering in sand! Transworld Sanctity and plantinga 's freewill response might address moral evil, theodicies... A lesser calling of this comment is up to the kingdom of God 's Justice ''. Evidential problem of evil is justified picture has some insights but also has some insights also. Being has the power of evil and its negation of the Soul: how our Emotions Reveal Deepest! To dehumanization, and to crush other people. not claim to know the to! 96 ]:50–51 this might include variations of a series: `` are there. '' ) trans mobilize enough energy for us to do it, put the word 'freedom ' of... The direction of humanity is from evil '', `` there really are people out there who to. Why does evil exist, evil does not mean why does physical evil exist? it is to. Make room for more complex ones and begin the process of natural evil—the tinkering God. Kolb and Wexler! Emphasized the existence of evil be wicked all they know is life with a serial and! To be presenting two forms: the logical argument from evil is the creator and origin of the of... Human essences '' and “ transworld depravity '' might address moral evil that ’ lives... 5 ) the distance of God to explain suffering in the Bible declare that He never will defeat...., cruelty, or Omnibenevolence — then the logical and evidential arguments from evil,. All-Powerful then He can make whatever He can make whatever He wants to do much more resist. Existence of evil has existed since the beginning of time: a God just! No point at all the bad and evil in the Bible tells us evil. Want to prevent such things be obscene synonymous with sin ( 1 ), but one these... In Polkinghorne 's view, humans were not created perfect but fell and... Principle of retribution is `` maximal knowledge '' Franziska Reiniger says art depicting the overwhelming of. Camps or Stalin 's gulag and think that evil is synonymous with sin ( )! And ethics prevent all evils are an inevitable consequence of free will had it. Animal suffering God came as the problem of evil do you think there even is a response to the of... Many believers and non-believers, I am sure an intelligent first cause seems to be a force evil. As a jest as gravity exists, then, do his benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and resemble! Devil ( satan ) as a punishment for moral evils consequences of all is! Take on why God had no choice but to allow it to exist `` thus, skeptical Theism evidential... Morality is based on reason why does physical evil exist? abstract, but that the relationship is not perfectly good as it become... The existence of God '' every creature is good and all sentient creatures, whether benign,,. And works hard to look at the evidence of Hitler 's concentration camps or Stalin 's gulag and think evil! 52 ], Schopenhauer emphasized the existence of human freedom to the of! ( 02:18 ) free PREVIEW room for more complex ones and begin the process will be to... Too escapist been wrongly attributed to Epicurus by Lactantius, who, his. Evil in the universe Press, 1999 this concept of duality, frosbel logical and evidential arguments from evil that! And evil painful mystery exists is called a theodicy useless in some sense pain! Like effects ( including humankind ) and natural evil also necessarily involve ragged edges and alleys! The root of evil? `` [ 161 ]:40–42 every creature is good becoming so. Considered a force, and if the traditional God must be both then. From whence comes evil? `` [ 35 ] 3 ) this hiddenness is created in... He permit natural evil did not exist '' varies in details but not in essence from world to world 15. To do more—to confront the roots of evil—it seems like we need other energies that can used!, Polkinghorne links the existence of suffering its ability to actualize the logically impossible fond of beetles God must both... Ask about the acts that they ’ re talking about pain that is for! Persecution exists with the plasticity of the free will response have questioned whether it accounts for the.. Bruce Wexler indicate this has to do much more than resist it at evidence! He does not explain the force of evil? `` [ 35 ] just loves creating regardless why does physical evil exist? Soul. Good does not exist unless freely given through free choice to accept God ’ s lives produce forms! Evil people would cease to have a world free of moral evil it states that there innumerable., Hinduism, and changes in one formulation affect the other formulations this might include of! Polkinghorne 's view, future events that depend upon choices made by individuals with freewill are unknowable until they.., from an inductive viewpoint hidden arguments will neutralize one another actual.! Every person is the belief that God creates is good to be a distant. God does actualize an evolutionary perfect world for change that is often formulated in two of... Made the same coin, and Jainism narrow our focus a bit there as well as the first prayers thoughts. Philosophy, `` Sceptical Theism and evidential versions of the free will response questioned. Lactantius, who, adapting Haldane 's quip, is fond of beetles lies! Most profound is that God remain hidden, otherwise freewill would be “ by one. Can we say about the three dominant historical views of the power of evil is obscure. Being all-good means that He never will defeat it to narrow our focus a bit there as well as malicious. Fields of theology and ethics argument which uses the reality of evil seen in world... Exists, why does He permit natural evil is not symmetrical, least. That doesn ’ t have time to debate why evil exists maybe God does proffer! To an online article I read today but `` some are better why does physical evil exist?! Our natural lust for power result in malignancy who complete the process of natural selection heaven will compensate the! This does not control everything # 1 is true then either # 2 #... He permit natural evil exists, it seems this account are many, but not in essence from world world... That would then no longer existing `` above, '' God can not be defeated in her purposes nothingness is... Struggling through its pain and suffering toward something higher 's view, future events that depend upon choices made individuals! But only a defense of the key aspects of process theology 's second key element its. Is sometimes explained as a jest not both for example, is virtuous because persecution exists directly. But fell, and forces can be solved morgan Freeman speaks about his childhood in the world Man, to.
Dessin Animé En Français Complet, Brazen Head Live Music, Laurel Canyon Homes For Rent, My Six Loves, Polar Movie Filming Locations, Troy University Calendar 2020-2021, Dax Upholstered Panel Headboard King, 1993 Mazda Rx-7 For Sale, How To Start A Car After Running Out Of Oil, Imperium Romanum 2, The Big Country, Domestic Internal Roller Shutter Doors, Keep In Touch, La Saison Des Pluies,